孙磊律师是北京大成律师事务所合伙人,跨境贸易与投资专业委员会理事,律协WTO与反倾销专业委员会副主任,中国商务部贸易救济法律顾问。2008年开始,孙律师专注于代理中国政府、企业应诉外国对华发起的贸易救济调查,是代理中国政府应诉对华反补贴调查最具项目经验的律师之一。
在美国市场极具经验,孙律师代理过的美国案件涵盖了美国贸易救济调查的所有程序,包括原审调查、年度复审、新出口商复审、产业损害调查、日落复审调查、情势变更调查、国际贸易法院(CIT)及联邦上诉法院(CAFC)等;在其他国别的贸易救济法律事务领域,孙律师曾代理中国中央政府和企业参加澳大利亚、加拿大、欧盟、印度、泰国、印度尼西亚等国对华发起的反倾销、反补贴、保障措施和特别保障措施调查案件;此外,孙律师曾代理通用汽车、新日铁公司等参加中国对美国、日本发起的贸易救济调查。在反垄断法律事务领域,曾代理美国、德国等公司向中国商务部进行国内并购经营者集中反垄断申报;在公司投资法律事务领域,曾为日本、美国等外国企业对华投资等商事活动提供法律意见。代表性案例包括:•美国对华镁碳砖、钻管、镀锌钢丝、实木复合地板(第一个美国对华反倾销、反补贴(“双反”)原审调查双零税率)等双反调查;•澳大利亚对华铝挤压材、螺纹钢、盘条等双反调查及退税调查;•印度对华亚硝酸钠、青霉素G盐等双反调查、保障措施和特别保障措施调查;•加拿大对铝挤压材、华钢格板等双反调查;•欧盟对华光伏电池、铜版纸双反调查;•中国对美、日等国汽车、干玉米酒糟等的双反调查。
Jason Sun is a partner in the international trade and investment group of Deontons’ Beijing office, a member of the Cross-border Investment and Trade Council, and vice director of the WTO anti-dumping commission. Sun served in the Beijing WTO Centre as assistant director, responsible for analysing the Uruguay Round legal documents. He focuses his practice on international trade law, counsels Chinese clients on trade remedy investigations against China, and is one of the most experienced lawyers representing the government of China in countervailing duties (CVD) investigations against China.
The cases he has represented cover all procedures of the US trade remedy investigation, including initial investigation, annual review, new shipper, industry injury, sunset review, changed circumstance, anti-circumvention, scope ruling, and US Court of International Trade (CIT) and the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) proceedings. In trade remedy fields, he has represented the government of China and Chinese enterprises in anti-dumping, countervailing, and safeguard measures cases initiated by the US, Australia, Canada, the EU, India, Thailand and Indonesia. He has represented foreign enterprises and successfully obtained the approval of the Ministry of Commerce of China for the Anti-monopoly Business Concentration Notification Procedure, and also has rich experience in legal services for foreign investment and other commercial activities. Typical case experience is as follows: US: anti-dumping (AD) or CVD investigations on magnesia carbon bricks, drill pipe, galvanized steel wire, multilayer wood flooring (the first case attaining double zero tax rate in AD and CVD investigations against China initiated by the US), steel wire hanger, etc.; Australia: trade remedy investigation on HSS, aluminium extrusion, wire rod, rebar products, etc., including duty refund assessment procedure; India: AD or CVD investigation on sodium nitrite, SDH, barium carbonate products and safeguard measure investigation on automobile parts against China; the EU: AD or CVD investigation on melamine, coated fine paper etc.; Canada: AD or CVD investigation on aluminium extrusion, Steel grating etc.; Indonesia: AD or CVD investigation on frit, wire rod, etc.; Thailand: AD or CVD investigation on hot rolled steel products, etc.; China: AD or CVD investigation on automobile, distiller dried grains against the US, Japan, etc. |