Force not allowed for recovery from hire-purchaser

0
1201
LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link

A three-judge bench of the Supreme Court recently held that any action for forcible recovery of vehicles under hire-purchase agreements when a hirer defaults on payments “cannot but be struck down”.

Maruti_Omni_van-CMYKRuling in Citicorp Maruti Finance Ltd v S Vijayalaxmi, the court directed that banks and financers that fail to follow guidelines set by the Reserve Bank of India could be saddled with punitive costs. The court reiterated that even the recovery of mortgaged goods which are under hire-purchase agreements has to be in accordance with the law and without the use of force.

Citicorp Maruti Finance had challenged a July 2007 decision of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission that upheld an order by a state consumer commission to increase the punitive damages imposed on it by a district consumer forum.

You must be a subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber to read this content, please subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe today.

For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.

你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员

已有集团订阅,可点击此处继续浏览。
如对集团订阅感兴趣,请联络我们

The update of court judgments is compiled by Bhasin & Co, Advocates, a corporate law firm based in New Delhi. The authors can be contacted at lbhasin@bhasinco.in or lbhasin@gmail.com. Readers should not act on the basis of this information without seeking professional legal advice.

LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link