LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link

Applicant D (the claimant in this arbitration case) is a Chinese enterprise, while the respondent V (the first respondent in the case) is an enterprise registered in Ontario, Canada. D and V signed a series of auto parts production, export and purchase agreements, agreeing that D would produce according to the orders issued by V and entrust the second respondent in the arbitration case – a Chinese enterprise, S – to handle customs clearance and other export procedures, which would eventually be used to supply to Chrysler in the US.

In addition, D and V signed several contracts on the development and production of moulds. The agreements and contracts all contained arbitration clauses that referred to Shanghai International Arbitration Centre for arbitration (SHIAC).

Later, as V failed to pay for the goods and the mould manufacturing fee under the relevant agreements, D filed an arbitration application with the SHIAC, requesting V to pay the amount and compensate for the loss, and requesting S to pay the withheld payment for the goods.

You must be a subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber to read this content, please subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe today.

For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.

你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员

已有集团订阅,可点击此处继续浏览。
如对集团订阅感兴趣,请联络我们


Xu Zhihe is the deputy head of the Department of Research and Information at SHIAC

LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link