Ruling in Jet Airways (India) Limited v Sahara Airlines Limited, a division bench of Bombay High Court recently dismissed appeals by both the appellant and the respondent against an order passed by a single judge of the court, holding that the appeals were not maintainable.
The order of the single judge had sought to enforce a settlement reached in April 2007 during arbitral proceedings in a long-running dispute between the Sahara group and Jet Airways.
The court held that the proceedings initiated by both Jet and Sahara before the single judge were under section 36 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and not under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908. As such, appeals against the order of the judge were not maintainable as India’s arbitration laws provide for appeals only against some specified orders and do not provide for an appeal against every order passed in arbitral proceedings.
You must be a
subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber
to read this content, please
subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe
today.
For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.
你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章，欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员。
The update of court judgments is compiled by Bhasin & Co, Advocates, a corporate law firm based in New Delhi. The authors can be contacted at lbhasin@bhasinco.in or lbhasin@gmail.com. Readers should not act on the basis of this information without seeking professional legal advice.
