Evidence needed to substantiate charge of collusion

0
1330
LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link

Dismissing a complaint in Muthoot Mercantile Ltd v State Bank of India & Ors, the Competition Commission of India (CCI) held that “parallel behaviour needs to be substantiated with the additional evidence” when allegations of the contravention of the provisions of section 3 of the Competition Act, 2002, are made. Section 3 prohibits anti-competitive agreements.

You must be a subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber to read this content, please subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe today.

For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.

你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员

已有集团订阅,可点击此处继续浏览。
如对集团订阅感兴趣,请联络我们

The dispute digest is compiled by Bhasin & Co, Advocates, a corporate law firm based in New Delhi. The authors can be contacted at lbhasin@bhasinco.in or lbhasin@gmail.com. Readers should not act on the basis of this information without seeking professional legal advice.

LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link