Enhanced IP civil protection as seen from typical cases

By Han Yufeng, Rui Bai Law Firm
0
1677

The issue of insufficiently intense civil judicial protection of intellectual property (IP) has long drawn attention. This has mainly been manifested as follows: (1) difficulty in adducing the evidence relating to the compensation of losses, such that, after the rights holder prevails at trial, the measure of damages is usually insufficient to make up the actual losses incurred by the rights holder, and is sometimes even less than reasonable expenditures incurred by the rights holder in safeguarding his or her rights; and (2) the rights holder is powerless to timely and effectively put a stop to the infringement and is only able to compel the infringer to do so after the entry into effect of the judgment, with some rights holders losing their competitive advantages even before securing a winning judgment.

Han Yufeng Senior Associate Rui Bai Law Firm
Han Yufeng
Senior Associate
Rui Bai Law Firm

These issues not only reduce rights holders’ willingness to safeguard their rights, but also further embolden infringers. Insufficient protective efforts not only make it impossible for China to demonstrate to the world a resolute stance on performing its IP protection obligations, but also make it impossible to provide sufficient assurance for the transformation of China into an “innovative” country. As a long-time IP practitioner, the author has noticed that the above-mentioned issues are not new and have drawn the attention of legislative and judicial authorities. In 2016, the author noticed that certain typical cases (summarized below) have shown signs that judicial authorities are further intensifying their efforts to protect IP:

Application of the system of “impediments to the adducement of evidence” leads to repeated record breaking for damages awarded for infringement.

In Maco Group Co Ltd v Beijing Xiujie Xinxing Building Materials et al, a case involving infringement of the exclusive right to use a registered trademark, and in Beijing Watchdata System v Hengbao, an invention patent infringement case, the Beijing Intellectual Property Court (BIPC) rendered, in November and December 2016, respectively, judgments awarding damages of RMB10 million (US$1.45 billion) and RMB50 million, respectively, rewriting the record for compensation by that court in two consecutive cases.

You must be a subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber to read this content, please subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe today.

For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.

你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员

已有集团订阅,可点击此处继续浏览。
如对集团订阅感兴趣,请联络我们

Han Yufeng is a senior associate at Beijing Rui Bai Law Firm

北京瑞栢律师事务所

BEIJING RUI BAI LAW FIRM

中国北京朝阳区东三环中路7号

北京财富中心写字楼A座37楼3702室 邮编:100020

Room 3702, 37/F Office Tower A

Beijing Fortune Plaza, 7 Dongsanhuan Zhong Road

Chaoyang District, Beijing 100020, China

电话 Tel: +86 10 6533 3300

传真 Fax: +86 10 6533 3000