The issue of a delay in re-filing an application under section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, for setting aside an award arose recently in the case of Delhi Development Authority v M/s Durga Construction Co. The questions before Delhi High Court were whether a court has the jurisdiction to condone delay in re-filing of an application under section 34 where the aggregate period of delay exceeds the limitation specified under section 34(3) and, if so, whether the delay in re-filing ought to be condoned.
You must be a
subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber
to read this content, please
subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe
today.
For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.
你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章，欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员。
The dispute digest is compiled by Bhasin & Co, Advocates, a corporate law firm based in New Delhi. The authors can be contacted at lbhasin@bhasinco.in or lbhasin@gmail.com. Readers should not act on the basis of this information without seeking professional legal advice.
