Arbitration clause does not bar filing complaints


In M/S Emaar MGF Land & Anr v Aftab Singh, the Supreme Court dismissed an appeal where the National Consumer Dispute Redressal Commission (NCDRC) held that an arbitration clause in buyers’ agreements does not circumscribe the jurisdiction of a consumer forum, notwithstanding amendment of section 8 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

In this case, the complainants purchased residential villas/flats/plots in Gurugram and Mohali from Emaar, a property developer, and executed buyers’ agreements, and subsequently alleged that Emaar had failed to deliver possession of these villas/flats/plots by the date agreed in the buyers agreement. The buyers sought directions from the NCDRC to take possession of the villas, etc., and for the developer to provide compensation. However, Emaar filed a set of applications under section 8 of the arbitration act that the parties be referred to arbitration as per the buyers’ agreements executed between them.

You must be a subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber to read this content, please subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe today.

For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.



The dispute digest is compiled by Bhasin & Co, Advocates, a corporate law firm based in New Delhi. The authors can be contacted at or Readers should not act on the basis of this information without seeking professional legal advice.