Arbitral institutions need innovation and fee flexibility

0
1695
LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link

This was our very first case against a US-based company where we were able to reach a settlement agreement before arbitration cost went out of control,” remarked the Chinese counsel from a very reputable firm in Beijing, with a touch of pride and surprise. In this recent case at the International Centre for Dispute Resolution (ICDR), where the Chinese company had filed for arbitration against a US company, both parties were able to reach a settlement agreement.

ddpicThe counsel’s remarks were by no means isolated. In recent years, arbitration has become a luxury that only a select few corporations can enjoy due to high costs and not so speedy procedures.

Instead of seeking to justify the costs, the industry must take a closer look at the composition of the industry as a whole and identify all the problematic areas that need improvement and renovation. In large part, three groups are responsible for the industry: institutions, arbitrators and practitioners.

You must be a subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber to read this content, please subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe today.

For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.

你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员

已有集团订阅,可点击此处继续浏览。
如对集团订阅感兴趣,请联络我们

The author, Michael Lee, is a vice president of the International Centre for Dispute Resolution and head of the centre’s Asia regional office in Singapore

LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link