Non-employer may make payments to provident fund

0
1496
LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link

In Ranbir Singh and Nafe Singh v M/s Ganga Ram Hospital, Delhi High Court recently held that “mere remittance” of provident fund payments by an entity does not create an employer-employee relationship between the entity and its alleged employee. As such, an agreement between Ganga Ram Hospital and a security services agency to which it had outsourced security services “cannot be said to be camouflage, bogus and sham” merely on the ground that the hospital has deposited the provident fund contributions of the agency’s employees.

You must be a subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber to read this content, please subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe today.

For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.

你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员

已有集团订阅,可点击此处继续浏览。
如对集团订阅感兴趣,请联络我们

The dispute digest is compiled by Bhasin & Co, Advocates, a corporate law firm based in New Delhi. The authors can be contacted at lbhasin@bhasinco.in or lbhasin@gmail.com. Readers should not act on the basis of this information without seeking professional legal advice.

LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link