Foreign majority of pharma medicine patent disputes

0
1329
patent
LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link

The Beijing IP Court recently issued a briefing about pharmaceutical patent disputes heard in the past five years, which found that 70% of chemical pharmaceutical patent cases are foreign-related, primarily to the US.

Founded in November 2014, the Beijing IP Court is one of the three specialized IP courts in China, with the other two being the Shanghai IP Court and the Guangzhou IP Court.

Under China’s current legal system, the National Intellectual Property Administration of China (CNIPA) is the only authority for patent grants and patent validity reviews in China, and the Beijing IP Court has exclusive jurisdiction over appeals of final written decisions from the CNIPA regarding patent grants and validity reviews.

Therefore, the Beijing IP Court holds the trial benchmark for exercising judicial power in patent grants and validity reviews of pharmaceutical patents in China.

From November 2014 to the end of February 2020, the Beijing IP Court accepted 702 case filings involving pharmaceutical patents, of which more than 80% involved invention patents.

Ninety percent of the 702 cases, or 608 cases, are appeals of final written decisions from the CNIPA, among which there are slightly more re-examination cases than invalidation cases.

According to the data released by the Beijing IP Court, nearly 40% of the pharmaceutical patent cases are chemical medicine patent cases. In the 251 chemical medicine patent cases, 70% of them involved foreign factors.

Countries like the US, Switzerland, Japan, Germany and globally well-known pharmaceutical entities such as Pfizer, Novartis, MSD, Abbott, Bayer all have been involved in a number of cases, among which US companies top the number.

You must be a subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber to read this content, please subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe today.

For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.

你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员

已有集团订阅,可点击此处继续浏览。
如对集团订阅感兴趣,请联络我们

Business Law Digest is compiled with the assistance of Baker McKenzie. Readers should not act on this information without seeking professional legal advice. You can contact Baker McKenzie by e-mailing Danian Zhang (Shanghai) at danian.zhang@bakermckenzie.com.

LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link