In the recent case of State Bank of India & Ors v Neelam Nag the Supreme Court held that the pendency of a criminal case “cannot be the sole basis” to indefinitely suspend disciplinary proceedings initiated against an individual.
The court was ruling on a recurring question as to whether disciplinary proceedings can be initiated before the completion of the recording of prosecution evidence in a criminal case that is based on the same facts.
You must be a
subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber
to read this content, please
subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe
today.
For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.
你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章，欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员。
The dispute digest is compiled by Bhasin & Co, Advocates, a corporate law firm based in New Delhi. The authors can be contacted at lbhasin@bhasinco.in or lbhasin@gmail.com. Readers should not act on the basis of this information without seeking professional legal advice.
