Analysis of ‘impediment’ in the UN’s CISG

0
1610
北京仲裁委员会/北京国际仲裁中心
LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link

The UN Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG) is considered a combination of different legal systems. An “impediment” in article 79, which is in its nature a force majeure provision, can be employed to relieve a non-performing party from liability.

In the absence of an official interpretation to the CISG, a case reporting system has been established to assist relevant stakeholders by making decisions of courts and arbitral tribunals interpreting the CISG available on the UN Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) website. The available cases involving application of article 79 show a quite low acceptance rate from 1995 to 2018, with only six of the 39 vendor claims having been supported, and the number for the 20 buyer claims being five. The “impediment” is not applicable when:

You must be a subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber to read this content, please subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe today.

For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.

你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员

已有集团订阅,可点击此处继续浏览。
如对集团订阅感兴趣,请联络我们

Liao Ming is an arbitrator of Beijing Arbitration Commission/Beijing International Arbitration Centre (BAC/BIAC) and a partner at Tahota Law Firm. BAC/BIAC case manager Jolie Guo also contributed to the article.

JOIN OUR FORUM

China Business Law Journal welcomes your responses to articles that appear in the Dispute Digest section. In line with our desire to make this section a regular forum of ideas, cases and observations, we also invite you to contribute. Articles should ideally be about 900 English words and 1,500 Chinese characters in length. Please send them to editor@cblj.com. We will publish the best and most topical articles each month.

LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link