SPAC IPO v traditional IPO: A Cayman perspective

    By Matt Roberts and Richard Holden, Maples Group in Hong Kong

    Special purpose acquisition companies (SPACs) have taken Wall Street by storm in the past year, with unprecedented numbers being used as an alternative route for companies to go public. In just the first quarter of 2021, a record USD96 billion was raised from 295 newly formed SPACs, according to a report by Harvard Business Review on 16 October 2021. As of 20 December 2021, about USD162 billion was raised from 609 newly formed SPACs, with an average IPO size of USD266 million.

    Matt Roberts
    Partner at Maples Group in Hong Kong and Singapore
    Tel: +852 3690 7405, +65 8388 8567

    The Cayman Islands and the British Virgin Islands (BVI) have been popular jurisdictions of choice for SPAC owing to the suitability of their respective company laws to SPACs, their flexibility, tax neutrality, market familiarity, the ability to redomicile to another jurisdiction on a business combination if required, and straightforward statutory merger regimes that are commonly used as a means of effecting a business combination, i.e. the acquisition or merger with the identified target business.

    SPACs led by an experienced management team are backed by a sponsor and raise cash to acquire or merge with a target company in a specific sector or industry. For US listings, the SPAC IPO and traditional IPO engage in an approval process with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

    The major differences revolve around the securities, the transaction documentation, the length of the process, the amount of disclosure in the offering document, and the valuation of the fund offering.

    The securities

    In a SPAC IPO, units sold to investors generally comprise a class A share and a fraction of a warrant to purchase a class A share. These separate securities comprising each unit can trade separately 52 days after the IPO, but not before. The class A shares are not subject to transfer restrictions and investors can choose to redeem their investment before the business combination or continue with the investment after assessing the potential return of the target business.

    Richard Holden
    Associate at Maples Group in Hong Kong
    Tel: +852 3690 7519

    In contrast, class B shares are issued to the sponsor and comprise the “promote”, and typically convert into class A shares at the time of the business combination on a one-for-one basis. The class B shares include the right to appoint and remove directors of the SPAC before the closing of a business combination. Cayman Islands or BVI companies listing on a US stock exchange choose to list American depositary receipts (ADRs) rather than making a direct equity listing.

    Each ADR evidences an ownership interest in American depositary shares which, in turn, represent an interest in the shares of the IPO company held by the applicable depository.

    Transaction documentation

    The key legal documents applicable to a traditional IPO process from a Cayman Islands and BVI perspective are the listing document, including the prospectus, the amended and restated memorandum and articles of association of the company (IPO M&A), any Cayman Islands and BVI legal opinions required by regulators, exchanges, depositories, registrar and transfer agents, or brokers or underwriters and requisite corporate approvals.

    In addition, documentation may be required to effect any pre-listing restructuring of the business group for the listing. Applicable underwriting agreements and depository or custody agreements would also be required.

    The key legal documents applicable to a SPAC IPO process from a Cayman Islands and BVI perspective are similar. These include the registration statement (for listing on a US stock exchange), the amended and restated memorandum and articles of association of the SPAC (SPAC IPO M&A), legal opinions at the time of the public filing regarding, among other things, the validity of the shares being issued in the offering, and those required by each of the underwriters and the registrar and transfer agent, and requisite corporate approvals.

    Material contracts, including the underwriting agreement, private and public warrant agreements, investment management trust agreement, transfer agency and registrar services agreement, and registration rights agreement, would be reviewed at the appropriate stage.

    The IPO M&A or SPAC IPO M&A will need to follow a form that meets the requirements of the applicable US stock exchange on which the company or SPAC is to be listed, as well as the legal requirements of the Cayman Islands or BVI.

    Cost and timing

    SPACs can be incorporated and go public in eight to 12 weeks, whereas an operating company may take anywhere from six to 12 months (or more) to go public when including the required preparations during a traditional IPO.

    The reason for the shorter timeline is that SPACs are not operating companies, thereby avoiding the need for lengthy due diligence, and there is a limited amount of information to disclose in a SPAC’s registration statement. As a result, there are clear cost and time benefits to the sponsor of a SPAC IPO compared with a traditional IPO.

    Acquisition window

    On a SPAC IPO, there is a defined timeframe (typically 18 to 24 months) within which the SPAC must complete the acquisition of a target business. A SPAC can quickly move to secure an acquisition target and de-SPAC – the name given to the acquisition process – relatively quickly due to its large cash reserves held in trust. If the SPAC fails to acquire a business within this defined timeframe, it must liquidate and return all funds raised in the SPAC IPO to its investors.


    SPAC sponsors receive what is known as the “promote”, which is usually 20% of the SPAC post-IPO issued share capital. This compensates the sponsors for the risk they take in putting up their at-risk capital to form and operate the SPAC between the time of its IPO and the de-SPAC, but effectively dilutes the public shareholders’ ownership of the IPO.

    Less scrutiny

    Going through a traditional IPO exposes a company to enormous scrutiny over the months leading up to the IPO, and can result in uncertainty around valuation methods up to the pricing of the IPO. SPACs are selling a management team rather than a product and company with an operating history, and are therefore usually not subject to the same level of examination.

    Redemption and PIPEs

    The ability of investors in a SPAC IPO to redeem their class A shares creates uncertainty on the amount of funds available to the SPAC to complete an acquisition, and whether the sponsors can secure additional funds from the private investment in public equity (PIPE) or other investors to complete the acquisition.

    The availability and costs of such additional funds are highly dependent on the market and economic conditions, and it may have a dilutive effect on the shareholding structure of the SPAC. This issue does not arise in a traditional IPO since investors cannot redeem shares to get their money back from the company.

    Underwriting fee

    One of the appealing features of a SPAC is that the underwriting fee for a SPAC IPO tends to be lower, at about 5.5%, than the 7% that investment banks charge in a traditional IPO.

    Looking ahead

    While some of the heat has come out of the SPAC IPO market since the beginning of 2021 amid increasing regulatory scrutiny (for example, the tightening of accounting guidance by the SEC) and a “wait and see” approach in the market, the main draw to the US SPAC IPO market, namely liquidity and trading volume, is likely to continue in the medium term.

    Of course, challenges lie ahead in both camps. As they go through their IPO and subsequent de-SPAC process, SPACs face many regulatory, legal and business hurdles, including obtaining the appropriate amount and type of insurance.

    For traditional IPOs, the choice of listing venue will be an ever more pressing concern, taking into consideration the company’s activities and factors like the level of shareholder approval, disclosure and minimum profitability requirements imposed by the rules of a particular listing venue, and wider geopolitical considerations such as data security and data privacy.

    Despite these challenges, opportunities abound for those companies, fund managers and sponsors seeking to raise capital in 2022 using the traditional or SPAC IPO route, provided they are prepared to navigate an increasingly complex regulatory landscape, where uncertainty is becoming the norm.


    26/F Central Plaza, 18 Harbour Road
    Wan Chai, Hong Kong
    Tel: +852 2522 9333