In TA Kathiru Kunju v Jacob Mathai the Supreme Court allowed an appeal filed by Kunju under section 38 of the Advocates Act, 1961, challenging the correctness of an order passed by the Disciplinary Committee of the Bar Council of India. The committee had found Kunju guilty of gross negligence in discharge of his professional service to a client for failing to abide by his client’s instruction to initiate criminal action against a debtor for dishonour of a cheque issued to the client, and for failing to return the cheque to the client.
You must be a
subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber
to read this content, please
subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe
today.
For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.
你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章，欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员。
