Allowing an appeal in Sharadamma v Mohammed Pyrejan (Deceased) through Legal Representives & Anr, the Supreme Court recently held that an assignor or seller does not lose his or her interest in an ongoing suit merely as a result of the assignment or release of the rights to the property in question.
In 1998, Sharadamma had unsuccessfully filed a suit before a trial court in Karnataka, for the purpose of declaration of title and for restoration of possession on the strength of a registered sale deed of a property dated 10 November 1965. She had also claimed a sum of ₹3,000 towards past damages and a further sum of ₹20 per day as continuing damages.
You must be a
subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber
to read this content, please
subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe
today.
For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.
你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章，欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员。
The dispute digest is compiled by Bhasin & Co, Advocates, a corporate law firm based in New Delhi. The authors can be contacted at lbhasin@bhasinco.in or lbhasin@gmail.com. Readers should not act on the basis of this information without seeking professional legal advice.
