Search and seizure guidelines assist in battle against IP piracy

By Manisha Singh Nair, Lex Orbis Intellectual Property Practice

Piracy is perhaps the most rampant issue that intellectual property (IP) rights holders struggle to cope with. It demands a strict enforcement mechanism. While search and seizure orders have a crucial role to play in enforcement, courts have commented on the appointment of local commissioners to carry out search and seizure operations.

Manisha Singh Nair
Lex Orbis Intellectual Property Practice

The Anton Piller provides the right to search premises and seize goods without prior warning, and aims to prevent the destruction of incriminating evidence, particularly in cases involving intellectual property.

The order derives its name from the 1976 English case of Anton Piller v Manufacturing Processes Limited, and requires that:

  1. an extremely strong prima facie case be established against the respondent;
  2. the damage, potential or actual, must be very serious for the applicant; and
  3. there must be clear evidence that the respondents have in their possession incriminating documents or things, and that there is a real possibility that they may destroy such material before an inter partes application can be made.

You must be a subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber to read this content, please subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe today.

For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.



Manisha Singh Nair is a partner at Lex Orbis, an intellectual property practice law firm headquartered in New Delhi.


709/710 Tolstoy House, 15-17 Tolstoy Marg

New Delhi – 110 001


电话 Tel: +91 11 2371 6565

传真 Fax: +91 11 2371 6556

网站 Website:

电子信箱 E-mail: