Watchdog’s power to seek call data records affirmed

By Suhail Nathani and Yogesh Chande, Economic Laws Practice
0
1719
LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link

A recent public interest litiga- tion filed before Bombay High Court by the Indian Council of Investors alleged that the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI) “violates and infringes the fundamental right of privacy available to citizens of India” by possessing the power to seek call data records (CDRs) and details of tower location from telecom service providers, and that it should “cease, desist and refrain” from calling for this information. While the court upheld SEBI’s powers, it also advised caution in the exercise of these powers, in order to avoid possible misuse and violation of an individual’s right to privacy.

‘Metadata’ versus content

CDRs are kept by telecommunication companies for billing purposes, and contain specifics on who made a call, who received a call, and how long the call lasted, but do not disclose informa- tion about call content. Thus, CDRs in effect are “metadata” – a sort of “infor- mation about information”.

Suhail Nathani
Suhail Nathani

Currently, nine agencies are per- mitted to request phone-tapping in India under the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885, and the rules made under it, namely: (i) the Intelligence Bureau; (ii) the Narcotics Control Bureau; (iii) the Directorate of Enforcement; (iv) the Central Board of Direct Taxes; (v) the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence; (vi) the Central Bureau of Investigation; (vii) the National Investigation Agency; (viii) the Research and Analysis Wing (India’s foreign intelligence agency); and (ix) the Directorate of Signal Intelligence, Ministry of Defence.

You must be a subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber to read this content, please subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe today.

For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.

你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员

已有集团订阅,可点击此处继续浏览。
如对集团订阅感兴趣,请联络我们

Suhail Nathani, a partner at Economic Laws Practice, and Yogesh Chande, an associate partner, represented SEBI before Bombay High Court in the above matter. Malek-ul- Ashtar Shipchandler, a trainee, assisted with research for this article, which is intended for informational purposes and does not consti- tute a legal opinion or advice.

ELP

109 A Wing, Dalamal Towers

Free Press Journal Road

Nariman Point, Mumbai – 400 021, India

Tel: +91 22 6636 7000

Fax: +91 22 6636 7172

Email: SuhailNathani@elp-in.com

YogeshChande@elp-in.com

Mumbai | New Delhi | Ahmedabad | Pune | Bengaluru | Chennai

LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link