New employer held liable for payment defaults

0
1166
LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link

Dismissing an appeal in Mcleod Russel India Limited v Regional Provident Fund Commissioner, Jalpaiguri & Ors the Supreme Court recently clarified that “criminal liability remains steadfastly fastened to the actual perpetrator and cannot be transferred by any compact between persons or even by statute”.

Employer_running_away_with_moneyRuling that damages imposed under section 14B of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952, would be recoverable “jointly and severally from the erstwhile as well as the current managements”, the court held McLeod Russel India liable for damages on account of default in remitting provident fund contributions by a previous owner of a company it had acquired.

You must be a subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber to read this content, please subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe today.

For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.

你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员

已有集团订阅,可点击此处继续浏览。
如对集团订阅感兴趣,请联络我们

The dispute digest is compiled by Bhasin & Co, Advocates, a corporate law firm based in New Delhi. The authors can be contacted at lbhasin@bhasinco.in or lbhasin@gmail.com. Readers should not act on the basis of this information without seeking professional legal advice.

LinkedIn
Facebook
Twitter
Whatsapp
Telegram
Copy link