Do treaties make states responsible to investors?

By Vivek Vashi and Nitisha Bishnoi, Bharucha & Partners
0
1232

Of the plethora of treaty-based claims initiated against India in the mid-2000s, White Industries’ arbitration claim is the only known treaty-based arbitration claim pending to date. A commercial affair between two companies has been elevated as an international claim and has enmeshed the government of India.

Vivek Vashi Partner Bharucha & Partners
Vivek Vashi
Partner
Bharucha & Partners

The dispute dates back to 1989, when White Industries and its Indian joint-venture partner, the state-owned Coal India, entered into a contract for the supply of equipment and development of coal mines at Piparwar (now Jharkhand). The 1989 agreement was governed by the International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Arbitration Rules and the contract purportedly excluded the operation of the Indian Arbitration Act, 1940.

Disputes arose in relation to certain entitlements to bonuses that were granted to White Industries under the agreement. White Industries referred the disputes to arbitration. In 2002, the arbitral tribunal awarded A$4.1million (US$4.2 million), plus interest and expenses, to White Industries.

You must be a subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber to read this content, please subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe today.

For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.

你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章,欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员

已有集团订阅,可点击此处继续浏览。
如对集团订阅感兴趣,请联络我们

Vivek Vashi is a partner in the litigation department at Bharucha & Partners where Nitisha Bishnoi is an associate

bp

Bharucha & Partners Advocates & Solicitors

Cecil Court, 4th Floor, MK Bhushan Road

Mumbai-400 039

India.

Tel: +91-22 2289 9300

Fax: +91-22 2282 3900

E-mail:sr.partner@bharucha.in