Can a citizen file a complaint for prosecuting a public servant under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988, and if so does the authority that sanctions the prosecution of the public servant have to take a decision within the time specified in Vineet Narain v Union of India and the guidelines issued by the central government and the Central Vigilance Commission?
Allowing an appeal in Dr Subramanian Swamy v Dr Manmohan Singh and another, the Supreme Court held that neither the Corruption Act nor the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, bars a citizen from filing a complaint for prosecution of a public servant who is alleged to have committed an offence.
The court observed that the “grant or refusal of sanction is not a quasi-judicial function and the person for whose prosecution the sanction is sought is not required to be heard by the competent authority before it takes a decision in the matter”. It added that the competent authority is only required to see if the material produced by the complainant or the investigating agency shows that the official had committed an offence.
You must be a
subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber
to read this content, please
subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe
today.
For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.
你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章，欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员。
The legislative and regulatory update is compiled by Nishith Desai Associates, a Mumbai-based law firm. The authors can be contacted at nishith@nishithdesai.com. Readers should not act on the basis of this information without seeking professional legal advice.
