The Supreme Court of India recently interpreted section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, read with section 14 of the Limitation Act, 1963, to decide whether time spent before the wrong court could be excluded from the time prescribed for challenging an arbitration award.
In Consolidated Engineering Enterprises v Principal Secretary (Irrigation Department) & Ors, the appellant company challenged an impugned arbitration award in the wrong court and later filed the case before the appropriate court. Two main questions arose for consideration: first, whether the Limitation Act would apply to proceedings in a court under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act; and second, in the case that the Limitation Act did apply, whether the applicability of section 14 of the act would exclude proceedings under section 34(i) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act.
While answering both questions in the negative, the court held that the inapplicability of section 5 of the Limitation Act was irrelevant to section 14, in relation to a case filed under section 34 of the Arbitration Act.
You must be a
subscribersubscribersubscribersubscriber
to read this content, please
subscribesubscribesubscribesubscribe
today.
For group subscribers, please click here to access.
Interested in group subscription? Please contact us.
你需要登录去解锁本文内容。欢迎注册账号。如果想阅读月刊所有文章，欢迎成为我们的订阅会员成为我们的订阅会员。
The update of court judgments is compiled by Bhasin & Co, a corporate law firm based in New Delhi. The authors can be contacted at lbhasin@bhasinco.in or lbhasin@gmail.com. Readers should not act on the basis of this information without seeking professional legal advice.
